Compendium of U.S. Copyright Practices, 3rd Edition

Search
Filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Chapter 100
Chapter 200
Chapter 300
Chapter 400
Chapter 500
Chapter 600
Chapter 700
Chapter 800
Chapter 900
Chapter 1000
Chapter 1100
Chapter 1200
Chapter 1300
Chapter 1400
Chapter 1500
Chapter 1600
Chapter 1700
Chapter 1800
Chapter 1900
Chapter 2000
Chapter 2100
Chapter 2200
Chapter 2300
Chapter 2400

1708.5 Amending the Application During an Administrative Appeal

1708.5 Amending the Application During an Administrative Appeal


When evaluating a first or second request for reconsideration, the U.S. Copyright Office will focus on the type of authorship claimed in the application, such as “2-D artwork” or “text.” As a general rule, the Office will not consider any type of authorship that was not expressly claimed in the application when the claim was refused. That said, the Office may allow an applicant to amend the application during a first or second appeal if the failure to include this information was the result of an honest omission or mistake.


Example:


An application is submitted for a children’s book titled The Empty Pi√ɬ±ata. The work contains artwork and a de minimis amount of text, but the applicant only asserted a claim in “text.” The registration specialist refuses registration. On appeal, the applicant admits that the words are uncopyrightable, and states that the applicant inadvertently failed to include a claim in “2-d artwork.” The Office will uphold the refusal to register the claim in “text,” and will consider whether the artwork contains a sufficient amount of creative expression to support a registration.

[convertkit form=2550354]